新华社相片,天津,2019年7月20日 (体育)(9)足球——中超:天津泰达对阵大连一方 7月20日,大连一方队球员在竞赛中庆祝进球。 当日,在2019赛季中超联赛第19轮竞赛中,天...
封面新闻记者 罗惟巍 喻言 马嘉豪 海报制造:罗乐历时八天,跨过五城,重庆荣昌市民林江因执着地“投喂”美国顶流网红“甲亢哥”荣昌卤鹅,以真挚的必杀技爆火网络,广阔网友亲热地称号他“荣昌卤鹅哥”。“荣昌...
央视网音讯:记者5月15日从国铁集团得悉,2025年1至4月,全国铁路发送旅客14.6亿人次,同比添加5.9%,创同期前史新高。应对客流添加,运力大幅提高。2025年1至4月,全国铁路新投用一批新式时...
杨某某尸检判定定见(受访人供图)
“我妈死得很委屈。”王先生称,自己的母亲与违法嫌疑人并无恩怨,自己家与对方家也没有任何胶葛,“两家间隔很近,有两百多米,还略微有点沾亲带故。”
依据王先生的描绘,母亲是一位地地道道的农村妇女,性情厚道本分,回想中从来没跟任何人发生过对立。付某某家里栽培烟,“因忙不过来,就找人曩昔帮助,也算是雇主,我妈便是其中之一。”王先生依据其时其他目击者的回想介绍,付某某着手前毫无预兆,忽然拿斧将母亲杀戮。王先生还说到,现场的目击者有多人,包含违法嫌疑人一家的亲属以及本村的乡民。“我赶回卢氏县的时分,我爸现已昏倒,在住院部,我妈在太平间,那一刻多么无助。”王先生表明自己的父亲因此事遭到影响而晕倒。
9月11日,依据卢氏县公安局判定定见通知书,杨某荣系被别人用锐器砍击颈部,导致颈髓严峻损害兼并失血性休克逝世。王先生说,依据卢氏县警方回复,杀人者疑似精力病患者。
王先生介绍,违法嫌疑人比自己小一岁,“小时分还一同玩过,并没发觉有反常,(付某某)有驾照平常还正常开车,仅仅听村里人说过,前几年去看过病,但详细什么病不清楚。”此外,让王先生比较愤慨的是,母亲逝世后,违法嫌疑人的家人并没有出头过。
前窑村一位村干部告知新黄河记者,没有传闻杨某某跟违法嫌疑人一家有经济胶葛和其他对立,杨某某比较本分也很勤劳精干,村里人对被害人都很怜惜。关于违法嫌疑人付某某是否有精力类疾病?这位村干部表明,没有传闻他有病。
新黄河记者联系到卢氏县公安局,一位工作人员介绍,案子正在有序侦查,在等判定成果,现已报请权威机构进行精力判定,感谢媒体监督支撑。
北京乾成律师事务所律师钟艳双以为,依据现有案情,首先要进行违法嫌疑人的刑事职责能力判定。假如判定成果承认违法嫌疑人在违法时具有彻底刑事职责能力,那么他将面对成心杀人罪的指控,依据《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百三十二条,成心杀人的,处死刑、无期徒刑或许十年以上有期徒刑;情节较轻的,处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑。假如违法嫌疑人被判定为无刑事职责能力的精力病患者,依据《中华人民共和国刑法》第十八条,不负刑事职责,但应责令其家族或许监护人严加看守和医疗,必要时由政府强制医疗。钟艳双还说到,即便违法嫌疑人不负刑事职责,监护人亦需承当民事补偿职责。受害者家族能够在刑事诉讼过程中,提起附带民事诉讼,要求监护人补偿其因违法行为形成的丢失,包含但不限于丧葬费、被抚养人生活费、逝世补偿金、精力损害补偿等。
新黄河记者:李运恒
(来历:济南时报-新黄河)
更多精彩资讯请在使用商场下载“极目新闻”客户端,未经授权请勿转载,欢迎供给新闻线索,一经采用即付酬劳。
因母亲忽然被害,王先生堕入巨大沉痛之中。王先生的母亲杨某某生活在河南省三门峡市卢氏县范里镇前窑村,8月8日,被同村人用斧子砍杀,依据尸检判定定见,杨某某系被别人用锐器砍击颈部。9月13日,新黄河记者从...
收拾丨何欣欣
曩昔一周,跨境电商范畴发生了这些事:
# 途径意向 #
【亚马逊】
1 亚马逊爱尔兰站正式上线
3月19日,亚马逊宣告正式在爱尔兰上线,为当地客户供应超越2亿种产品,一切产品以欧元计价。爱尔兰企业也将出现在专门的“爱尔兰品牌”页面上,助力本地企业开展。已有英国Prime会员资历的爱尔兰客户可转换为爱尔兰会员,并享用30天免费试用。一同,亚马逊爱尔兰站已面向包含我国卖家在内的全球卖家敞开。此前现已在亚马逊欧洲站点开店的卖家,可直接在卖家后台上架亚马逊爱尔兰站。自2004年进入爱尔兰,20年来,亚马逊已直接出资超220亿欧元,并于2022年树立了FBA仓储运营中心。此次上线电商站点,有助于亚马逊进一步拓宽欧洲商场。
2 亚马逊美国站将于4月15日前移除可熔化FBA库存
3月18日音讯,亚马逊美国站发布公告称,为契合产品质量规范,配送中心将在4月15日至10月15日期间不再承受可熔化库存,并将对逾期库存进行收费处理。依据公告,4月15日后仍寄存在亚马逊配送中心的可熔化库存或许会被标记为“无法配送”,并从5月1日起收取相关处理费用。可熔化库存指在一切长时刻露出于155华氏度(约68摄氏度)环境下会熔化的热敏产品,包含但不限于巧克力、软糖、特定果冻和蜡基产品。对此,亚马逊主张卖家在4月15日条件交移除订单,以避免库存被处理。
3 亚马逊加拿大站要求卖家完毕资质审阅 聚集商户身份合规
日前,亚马逊加拿大站即日起逐步施行资质审阅新规,要求一切新老卖家提交资料完毕合规验证。新卖家需经过审阅方可注册出售权限,现有卖家需在触发审阅后60天内完毕验证,不然将面对出售和提现约束。审阅资料包含:我国大陆个人卖家需供应身份证及地址证明;企业卖家需提交经营执照、公司章程、地址证明及自我证明文件(含股权结构及受益人信息),若受益人与联系人不一起还需额定授权书。审阅流程要求卖家以拉丁文填写地址,并经过多轮核验保证企业实践操控人信息通明。
4 亚马逊英国站推出EPR代付服务费 4月1日起收效
亚马逊英国站发布公告,宣告自4月1日起推出出产者延伸职责(EPR)代付服务,以帮忙卖家恪守英国EPR要求。依据公告,未在英国本地树立但在Amazon.co.uk出售包装产品和空包装的卖家均需交纳EPR代付服务费。亚马逊表明,EPR代付服务可帮忙卖家保证其产品契合英国EPR规矩,然后顺畅进行出售。亚马逊将依据监管要求,向出产者职责组织(PRO)陈述并付出生态奉献费,随后从卖家的出售账户中扣除相关费用。
5 亚马逊德国站调整退货规矩 对包装退货订单收取费用
3月17日音讯,亚马逊近期调整了德国商场的退货方针,对部分包装好的退货订单开端收取费用,而无包装退货依然免费。退货费用的适用范围取决于卖家类型。亚马逊自营产品的免费退货选项较多,包含DHL和UPS的多个网点,而第三方卖家出售的产品免费退货的挑选则更受限,仅限于无包装退货至UPS店,其他退货方法均需付出1.95至2.95欧元。
6 亚马逊日本站下降大件产品的配送及仓储费用4月1日起收效
亚马逊日本站宣告自2025年4月1日起调整物流费用:部分大件产品配送费下调(千元以上产品部分尺度段降价,千元以下坚持66日元/件扣头);非服装鞋靴类大件仓储费下降,规范尺度及服装鞋靴类仓储费不变。一同,超龄库存(寄存超365天)附加费分阶段上涨,退货处理、放置及预处理服务费同步上调。6月1日起物流适用范围扩展至总尺度260-400厘米、分量50公斤以内的产品。AWD服务费率调整为入库/出库各1.35美元/箱,运送费升至1.15美元/立方英尺。此次调整旨在优化仓储功率,卖家需加强库存周转以躲避新增本钱。
7 亚马逊春季大促将启 要点推行Amazon Haul
3月21日音讯,亚马逊年度“春季大促”(Big Spring Sale)将于3月25日正式发动,将继续至3月31日。本年的促销活动面向一切顾客,但Prime会员将享用额定扣头。此次大促包含35多个品类,供应最高40%的扣头,触及服装、美妆、野外家具和园艺用品等抢手产品。这次大促期间,亚马逊还将特别要点推行贱价途径Amazon Haul,顾客在大促期间购买该途径产品可享用50%扣头。
8 亚马逊免费向卖家敞开生成式AI东西“亚马逊品牌起名星”
3月18日,亚马逊全球开店宣告免费敞开于上一年12月初次发布的"亚马逊品牌起名星(Amazon Brand Name Generator)"东西。该东西依据生成式AI技能,帮忙企业生成契合海外文明语境的英文品牌构思。该东西供应美国专利商标局(USPTO)开端查找成果,并支撑一键跳转至亚马逊IP Accelerator项目,对接协作律所帮忙完毕商标示册及品牌流程,助力企业高效布局世界品牌。
【TikTok】
1 TikTok Shop全保管推出新商加快方案
3月17日音讯,为帮忙TikTok Shop全保管归纳职业新商家快速上手运营,TikTok Shop正式推出“新商加快方案”,经过任务引导、运营攻略、现金鼓舞、直播训练四个模块供应全方位支撑。从开店设置到爆单技巧,“新商加快方案”一站式指引商家供应优质好货,助力新手商家在TikTok Shop提早完毕爆单。
2 TikTok Shop欧洲站敞开我国主体卖家入驻
3月21日音讯,TikTok Shop跨境更新了欧盟(德国、西班牙、法国、意大利)和英国站点跨境店的入驻需求,依据最新入驻规矩,TikTok Shop欧盟(德意法西)和英国跨境店入驻主体资历由此前的仅限本乡卖家,放宽至我国大陆&我国香港主体。
3 TikTok Shop英区跨境POP进一步敞开,支撑10+途径商家入驻
日前,TikTok Shop英国站宣告晋级跨境自运营(POP)形式,面向亚马逊、沃尔玛、eBay等10个干流途径及DTC独立站商家敞开入驻通道。新方针要求商家主体需与原途径一起,持有英国VAT税号及本地发货才干,并满意第三方店肆评分合格、运营超3个月等条件,仅限公司主体入驻。契合资质的美区跨境POP商家可一键注册英国海外仓店肆(最多5家),享用90天佣钱减免(最低2%)、VAT代缴、流量扶持及物流补助等权益。现在英区已敞开消费电子、家居园艺等26个一级类目,需交纳400英镑保证金。
4 马来亚银行与TikTok Shop发动东盟中小企业技能进步方案
马来亚银行(Maybank)与马来西亚TikTok Shop签署体谅备忘录,发动东盟中小型企业技能进步和数字化方案。该方案旨在帮忙中小企业选用数字商务并拓宽事务。试点方案将于下月在马来西亚发动,包含网络研讨会、讲习班和为期六个月的加快方案。社区金融服务集团首席履行官表明,方案将运用两边优势,为企业家供应常识、见地、技能和东西,助力企业面向未来。参加者将在数字处理方案、内容驱动型电子商务和账户办理技能方面取得实践经验。马来西亚榜第一批学员将要点重视女人企业家,与Maybank的HERpower方案一起,该方案旨在补偿资金缺口、扩展时机和促进经济包容性。
5 TikTok Shop马来西亚延伸退货期
为了进步买家满意度,针对一切经过TikTok Shop Mall购买的产品,TikTok Shop Mall卖家需求为买家供应为期15天的退货期。但是,针对马来西亚站点,TikTok Shop东南亚跨境发布最新调整方针,自2025年3月26日起,针对部分买家经过TikTok Shop Mall购买的产品,TikTok Shop Mall卖家需求为买家供应为期30天的退货期。
【Temu】
1 Temu加快全保管转半保管流程
跟着美国方针改变,尤其是T86清关或许迎来新一轮调整,Temu正全力推动全保管卖家向半保管形式转型,方案于4月完毕全量爆款产品的强制搬迁。与全保管不同,半保管形式下卖家需自行处理物流,这将对卖家的资金链和跨境物流才干提出更高要求。为加快转型,Temu已供应全保管与半保管产品绑定功用,并对半保管产品给予流量歪斜和高效核价支撑。但是,卖家需注意物流费用添加带来的资金压力,并慎重挑选物流商,避免因违规运用跑水面单等行为导致处分。
2 Temu未预定商家库房回绝收货 3月23日起收效
日前,Temu宣告自3月23日起,对广东仓及义乌仓一切自送货商家施行严厉预定制。不管选用VMI(供货商办理库存)或JIT(按时制出产)形式,未提早预定的商家将面对库房拒收。
依据新规,自送司机需经过以下流程完毕送货:1.扫描提货码:卖家需在后台生成提货码,司机可凭码收取任务;2.预定送仓:输入司机手机号验证后,挑选送仓时段或兼并相同地址任务;3.报到与卸货:到仓后扫描收货员报到码,运用库房供应的PDA扫描箱唛完毕交代;4.承认离场:卸货完毕后需扫描放行单方可脱离。若未遵从流程,卸货任务将无法完毕。该方针旨在优化库房运营功率,商家需及时调整送货组织以避免延误。
3 Temu与跨境付出途径dLocal达到战略协作
跨境付出途径dLocal宣告与全球电子商务途径Temu树立战略协作伙伴关系,旨在为非洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲14个新式商场的数百万客户供应契合当地偏好的无缝、安全付出挑选。新式商场在运用全球电子商务时面对付出方法有限和许多无银行账户人口的妨碍,据世界银行核算,全球仍有14亿成年人没有银行账户。此外,付出处理方案缺乏导致购物车抛弃率超越70%。经过此次协作,dLocal支撑Temu在墨西哥、哥伦比亚、乌拉圭等14个首要新式商场供应无缝付出体会,应对这些应战。
4 Temu宣告扶持优质视频产品
日前,Temu途径针对近7日上传优质视频的产品施行流量加推扶持,过审次日即可免费享用3-7日的加推服务。此举旨在鼓舞热销款产品预备并上传优质视频,以摆开与竞品的距离,促进转化并进步产品权重。据悉,该功用现在已正式上线,并在欧区取得了显著效果。数据显现,欧区现在有50%的用户会更多地推送新上传视频的产品,这些产品的曝光涨幅约达到了17.9%。而在美区,加权战略算法仍在调整中,估计未来也将为优质视频产品带来更多的流量扶持。
5 Temu严打虚伪本乡店,封店冻资引卖家忧虑
日前,Temu途径对本乡店肆翻开严查,多位卖家因“资料不实”被批量封禁,账户余额遭冻住。封店原因包含资料造假、手机号非本地及地址不实等“灰色”操作。虽然Temu入驻规矩清晰,但前期审阅系统不完善,给了部分卖家“钻空子”的时机。跟着审阅机制完善,这些缝隙正被快速封堵,卖家面对“店财两失”窘境。
业界以为,此次封店是Temu应对法令危险和竞赛壁垒的必然挑选。若怂恿虚伪本乡店,途径或许被认定为“帮忙逃税”,面对巨额罚款;一同,为抢占合规卖家资源,进步商场诺言,Temu需整理不合规店肆。如意大利检察机关指控亚马逊逃税12亿欧元,触及帮忙我国卖家躲避增值税。Temu的整理举动宣告跨境职业草莽年代或将完结,卖家需扎根本乡化运营与合规建造,才干站稳全球商场。
6 Temu宣告从头上线西班牙和意大利
日前,跨境电商途径Temu宣告正式重启西班牙和意大利站点,接连贱价补助战略并深化本地化运营,包含引进半保管形式,并将物流配送时效优化至7-10日达。
7 Temu在乌兹别克斯坦成功注册实体,运营问题仍待处理
据外媒报导,Temu正式在乌兹别克斯坦注册为法令实体,并成为该国的本地企业。乌兹别克斯坦税务委员会承认了这一音讯,一同表明,虽然Temu现已完毕注册,但其过往运营活动中的一些问题仍在进行谈论,现在商洽仍在进行,终究决议将在程序完毕后发布。
8 Temu在巴基斯坦登顶谷歌下载榜
据报导,Temu在巴基斯坦商场的快速增加引发了广泛重视。该途径凭仗活跃的商场推行、贱价扣头及丰厚的产品种类,敏捷攀升至巴基斯坦Google Play Store下载榜首。但是,用户反应显现其可靠性、安全性及数据隐私问题引发争议。不少用户对购物体会表明不满,谈论中频频提及产品质量良莠不齐、配送推迟以及客服呼应不及时等问题。部分顾客反映收到的产品存在缺点,乃至与订单内容彻底不符,而退款恳求往往得不到回应。
9 TEMU在韩国树立大型物流中心 深化本地事务运营
3月21日音讯,TEMU最近签署了坐落韩国京畿道金浦市九来洞的大型物流中心的长时刻租约,并方案深化本地事务运营。这是我国电商途径初次在韩国树立大型物流中心,该物流中心总建筑面积约16.5万平方米,地下1层,地上10层,装备规范设备和冷链设备,由乐天集团旗下物流子公司乐天全球物流担任运营。TEMU考虑将该中心作为韩国总部所在地,跟着该物流中心的投入运用,经过TEMU购买的我国直购产品配送时刻有望大幅缩短,然后进步顾客的购物体会。
【速卖通】
1 速卖通3月冲上澳大利亚购物App下载榜榜首名
3月18日音讯,速卖通AliExpress三月周年庆大促已于海外时刻3月17日零点正式开卖。据悉,速卖通3月冲上澳大利亚购物下载榜榜首名,成为澳大利亚人最喜欢的购物途径。速卖通在澳大利亚物流履约方面也在继续优化,跨境产品最快5日送达,本地产品则最快1日即可送达。据了解,家居收纳、园艺东西、潮玩玩具、消费电子和轿车配件是澳大利亚顾客近期酷爱的产品品类。
2 速卖通将扩展非洲区域的本地付出选项
3月19日音讯,AliExpress(速卖通)近来宣告扩展非洲区域的本地付出选项。自本年3月起,将为埃及、南非、阿尔及利亚、埃塞俄比亚、摩洛哥和坦桑尼亚的顾客供应本地钱银付出方法,以进步购物便当性和付出安全性。这一举动紧随上一年推出的多种移动付出方法,旨在进一步改进全球产品的获取体会,并促进跨境电商在非洲商场的增加。
【Shopee】
1 Shopee将施行新海外仓入库方针
Shopee跨境店宣告,自2025年4月1日(当地时刻)起,将在新加坡、马来西亚、菲律宾和泰国站点施行新的海外仓入库方针,旨在进步服务质量并削减资源糟蹋。针对暂时撤销入库预定或失约行为,Shopee将采纳严厉办理办法。详细而言,若卖家在预定派送日期前一天或当天撤销,或未能在预定日期当天抵达,将视为违规。每季度内,初次违规将收到我国卖家中心(CNSC)的正告;第2次及以上违规,则视对库房的影响程度,给予CNSC正告或罚分1分,且每周最高罚分可达2分。
2 DITP与Shopee签署第二份体谅备忘录,经过TOPTHAI支撑泰国卖家
日前,世界买卖促进部(DITP)宣告与东南亚抢先的电子商务途径Shopee达到第二份体谅备忘录(MOU),旨在经过TOPTHAI项目支撑泰国中小企业进步出售额。DITP方案推动超越3000名企业家进入Shopee途径上的TOPTHAI商铺,一同与新加坡海外买卖促进办公室协作,在Shopee Singapore途径进步行了为期三个月的促销活动(2月1日至4月30日),推行泰国的健康和美容产品及家居装饰品。DITP估计年出售额将超越2000万泰铢。现在,TOPTHAI商铺现已在马来西亚、菲律宾等多个国家的Shopee途径上运营。
3 Shopee菲律宾本乡店多次不合格产品将面对下架
Shopee菲律宾本乡店推出新的产品办理方针,多次不契合质量规范的产品或许被暂时下架或删去,以保证顾客满意度和途径购物体会。此前,Shopee已规矩收到过多1-2星差评的产品将被躲藏或删去。卖家可经过指定表单申述被躲藏或删去的产品,并可经过卖家服务页面告发不相关或谩骂性谈论。Shopee将依据评级和谈论攻略点评并删去违规谈论。
4 Shopee巴西站顾客日出售额较黑五增加超10%
据外媒报导,Shopee巴西站在顾客日的出售额较2024年黑色星期五增加10%以上,成为上半年最微弱的出售日,占商场订单量的90%以上。据了解,轿车与摩托车、电子产品和日子方法成为当日最热销品类。此外,直播带货成为推动销量的重要方法,Shopee当天共进行超越2000场直播,较上一年同期增加200%,点赞量挨近双11期间的2.3亿次。途径招引了许多中小零售商及Nivea、RealMe、InPower、Okos等闻名品牌参加,累计观看量超2100万次,总点赞数打破1.6亿。
5 Shopee巴西推出Shopee Video,加强文娱与购物交融
Shopee巴西宣告推出运用内短视频东西“Shopee Video”,集文娱和购物于一体,每天发布的视频已超越15,000个,强化了公司立异用户体会的战略。Shopee Video答运用户创立和修改短视频,并可直接购买视频中的产品,一同供应点赞、谈论和共享选项,激起用户参加。卖家、联盟会员和顾客均可共享视频,展现产品、新闻和购物体会。Shopee品牌和实时商务主管Rodrigo Farah表明,方针是进步顾客和卖家之间的参加度,以创造性和互动方法展现产品。该功用反映了文娱与电子商务结合的趋势,并融入了游戏化元素,使阅读更具趣味性。
【Shopify】
1 Shopify决议将其美国上市地址由纽交所转至纳斯达克
3月20日音讯,电商公司Shopify公司周三宣告,将主动把在美国的证券买卖所上市地址,从纽约证券买卖所转至纳斯达克全球精选商场。这家电子商务公司估计,其A类股票将于3月28日周五纽交所收盘时中止买卖,并于3月31日开端在纳斯达克买卖。Shopify在多伦多证券买卖所的上市不受影响,其A类股票将继续在多伦多证券买卖所和纳斯达克挂牌买卖。(财联社)
2 Shopify结账及后台设置功用再晋级
Shopify近来推出多项功用更新,帮忙商家抢占全球先机,轻松办理跨境事务。Managed Markets世界出售东西新增自主挑选功用,商家可灵敏办理方针商场,完毕海外事务本地化运营。一同,Shop运用新增法语、德语及西班牙语显现言语,并支撑主动匹配客户设备言语,优化全球购物体会。此外,Shopify Plus商家现可经过Checkout Blocks自定义结账页面,依据购物车规矩或客户条件躲藏特定付款方法或礼品卡,满意更多个性化需求。桌面端及移动端设置页面也新增查找功用,帮忙商家快速定位选项,进步运营功率。
【沃尔玛】
1 沃尔玛推出AI帮手Wally
沃尔玛推出生成人工智能(AI)帮手Wally,帮忙商家优化收购决议方案,并进步线上下运营功率。据了解,Wally依据沃尔玛专有数据,可以即时生成商业洞悉,为商家供应数据支撑。该东西可主动履行数据剖析、辨认产品体现改变原因、回答运营问题,并创立待处理工单。此外,Wally还能履行杂乱核算和出售猜测,削减手动操作,进步供应链办理功率。
【其他途径】
1 敦煌网上线IM买家点评功用
IM作为衔接买卖两边的要害桥梁,一直以来在帮忙商家处理买家问题、进步买家购物体会以及促进店肆订单增加方面发挥着重要作用。为进一步进步途径服务质量,优化买家购物体会,敦煌网IM即时沟通东西现已正式上线“买家点评”功用。现在,买家在完毕IM会话服务后,便可直接对所获服务进行点评和打分。
2 Facebook成英国最受欢迎交际电商途径
YouGov的一项查询显现,跟着交际媒体途径不断融入电商功用,交际电商在英国商场的影响力日益增强。在交际电商途径的挑选上,Facebook以11%的用户占比成为最受欢迎的途径,其次是TikTok,占比7%,Instagram则以5%紧随其后。相比之下,YouTube和X(原Twitter)在该范畴的影响力较小,仅有2%的交际购物者挑选这些途径,而Pinterest和Snapchat的运用率更低,商场反应不明显。
3 Ozon推扣头产品出售 独联体卖家享便当
3月19日音讯,Ozon针对在独联体运营的卖家,推出了依据FBS和real FBS出售方案的扣头产品出售服务。卖家可自主决议扣头力度,最高可达99%,用于出售二手、损坏产品或废品。
据Ozon Business CIS的Telegram频道音讯,卖家无需再在第三方途径创立账户和卡,也无需为扣头产品规划交给方法,一切流程均可在Ozon途径按惯例作业方案完毕。一切打折产品将会集在网站专门版块展现,产品卡片会清晰标示降价信息及原因,有助于下降退货率。扣头产品的出售和交给流程与FBS或real FBS上的惯例操作无异。现在,Ozon已在亚美尼亚、白俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦等独联体国家开展事务,为当地卖家供应了更快捷的电商出售挑选。
4 4月1日起,Ozon将施行退货产品额定包装有偿方针
自2025年4月1日起,Ozon将为FBO和FBS方案下的卖家供应一项新的有偿服务——退货产品的额定包装。依据新合同规矩,订单交给点(ADP)的职工将担任包装客户试穿或收货后退回的产品。在退货品流中,卖家可自主决议哪些货品需额定维护。初始阶段将运用安全袋进行包装,未来还方案选用包装箱等其他资料。此项服务首要针对初级包装易损或翻开后无法再运用的产品。该服务为可选项目,每件产品附加包装费用为9卢布,其间4卢布为Ozon公司供应的安全包装费用,5卢布为PVZ职工的作业费用。有关该服务的详细信息将在服务正式推出前供应给卖家,以便他们更好地了解并决议是否选用此项服务。
5 Wildberries进步退货关税与新卖家保证金
Wildberries公司宣告进步退货关税,新规矩已正式收效。依据新规,若买方未在14天内从交货地址提货,退货费用将增至200卢布;若在规矩期限前撤销订单,且订单条款有规矩,买方需付出100卢布。
Wildberries表明,受新关税影响的退货份额不到订单总数的1%,此举旨在削减交货点无人认领订单,进步交给功率。一同,Wildberries还将新卖家的“保证金”金额进步了三倍,从原先的10,000卢布增至30,000卢布,注册时刻缺乏14天且没有付出费用的卖家金额坚持不变。该公司称,进步保证金是为了承认买卖方目的的严肃性,并筛选出潜在诈骗者,但此举也引发了部分卖家的不满。
6 Wildberries考虑2025年进军新商场,稳固现有位置
Wildberries公司创始人塔蒂亚娜·金在俄罗斯工业家和企业家联盟大会上泄漏,公司正考虑在2025年进入新的商场,并方案稳固在已有商场的位置。金表明:“开展,强大。咱们现在期望在现已开展事务的国家加强实力,或许也会开辟新的国家。”现在,Wildberries已在俄罗斯、白俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦等多个国家供应货品,并从我国进口产品。关于新商场,金未详细阐明。
此外,她还说到公司正在重视政治范畴的改变,并表明品牌回归与否对公司而言都是功德。金弥补说,Wildberries在2024年的收尾作业超出预期,估计年末商场经营额将增加60%。
7 Wildberries为俄罗斯卖家敞开B2B买卖测验通道
3月21日音讯,Wildberries近来为一切俄罗斯卖家敞开了B2B买卖测验通道。现在,每个协作伙伴均可代表其法人或独资企业,在途径进步行产品的出售与购买。要作为B2B买家下单,只需在个人档案中点击“以企业身份购买”按钮,即可切换至“Wildberries for Business”途径。产品出售供应两种形式:“从Wildberries库房”及“商场”(从卖方库房出售)。
8 eBay澳大利亚将测验拍卖体会改变,简化付出流程削减卖家困扰
据外媒报导,eBay澳大利亚宣告将测验拍卖物品体会的部分改变,旨在帮忙买家快速付出并削减卖家未付款物品的烦恼。部分拍卖物品的出价者需先设置付款方法和配送地址才干出价,赢得拍卖后,买家可在一小时内更改结账概况,不然eBay将主动处理订单。出价时可用付款方法包含信用卡/借记卡和PayPal,买家也可在拍卖完毕后1小时内更改付款方法或运用礼品卡、代金券等。本次测验估计继续2个月。关于买家,eBay将保存付款概况以便快速出价,且赢得同一卖家多件物品时仍可享用兼并运送服务。卖家无需改变拍卖物品刊登设置,估计未付款物品数量将削减。eBay正在研讨处理方案,以削减多件物品兼并运送时的运费问题。
9 土耳其电商途径Trendyol推出新斋月促销活动
3月18日音讯,阿里旗下土耳其电商途径Trendyol推出新的斋月促销活动,旨在加强其在海湾区域的商场影响力,并推动土耳其制作商的电子出口增加。为支撑土耳其制作商出口,Trendyol不只供应物流服务,还承当部分卖家的营销出资,并在利雅得和迪拜设有办事处和库房,以优化供应链功率。经过技能和基础设备投入,Trendyol正加快海湾商场扩张,并助力土耳其卖家在世界商场上站稳脚跟。
# 商家音讯 #
1 吉祥轿车入驻Wildberries途径
日前,吉祥轿车宣告旗下车型正式登陆Wildberries途径,顾客只需轻点几下鼠标,即可快速、快捷地选购心仪的吉祥轿车。此次线上购车服务极大进步了买卖功率,省去了传统购车需前往经销商的繁琐流程。Wildberries途径供应全通明、高安全性的买卖环境,一切展现的吉祥车型均保证有库存。购车者运用与Wildberries个人资料相关的银行卡进行100%预付款后,车辆将被送至最近的吉祥经销中心或客户指定地址。
2 追觅扫地机2024年全球累计销量396万台,增速近60%
3月19日,在追觅科技生态发布会上,追觅扫地机事业部总裁孟佳泄漏,2024年追觅扫地机全球累计销量396万台,增速近60%;追觅机械臂宗族扫地机全球累计销量超200万台。
3 石头科技斩获扫地机器人量额全球榜首
世界数据公司IDC发布《全球智能家居设备商场数据盯梢陈述》,陈述显现石头科技完毕2024年全球销量及销额双榜首,出货量上首度超越iRobot拔得头筹。占全年全球销量商场份额16%、销额商场份额达22.3%,出货量同比增加20.7%。详细而言,石头科技在丹麦、芬兰、德国、韩国、挪威、瑞典、土耳其等国家均为量额双榜首。全球范围内出售量的激增,使得石头科技成为又一家营收破百亿的上市公司。2024年石头科技完满意年营收119.27亿元,较上年同期增加37.82%,第四季度经营收入较上年同期增加65.94%。
4 国产雪糕品牌成为印尼榜首,一年营收近30亿
我国品牌艾雪(Aice)自2015年进入印尼商场以来,凭仗差异化竞赛和深度本乡化战略,成功在东南亚冰淇淋商场站稳脚跟,如本年营收超30亿,稳居东南亚传统途径榜首、全途径第二。艾雪瞄准印尼下沉商场,推出低至2000印尼盾(约合人民币0.9元)的平价冰淇淋,并经过乡村中小商铺等空白途径触达顾客,完毕7年60倍的惊人增速。一同,艾雪深化当地日子进行产品调研,推出麻薯系列等爆款产品,并在印尼自建三家工厂,完善本乡经销网络。此外,艾雪活跃承当社会职责,经过公益活动赢得政府、商家和顾客认可,接连三年取得“尖端社会职责企业”称谓,构筑起用户信赖,成为东南亚雪糕品牌的常青树。
# 物流与付出途径 #
1 PayPal推出包裹追寻服务
3月18日音讯,PayPal现在新推出了包裹追寻服务,商户上传了物流单号后,就能主动同步买卖及物流信息。对商户来说,假如碰到“未收到产品”这类型的争议,许多都可以经过主动化的争议处理流程来处理,很大程度上下降了处理争议的费用本钱和时刻本钱。对买家来说,购物体会也会大幅进步。
2 UPS对我国包裹收取附加费
3月17日音讯,UPS宣告依据不同区域按每公斤收取附加费。这些附加费用将适用于美国、其他北美和南美、欧洲、非洲、印度次大陆和中东的出口货品。UPS表明,从我国大陆、我国香港和我国澳门运出的包裹,美国商家将需求付出每公斤66美分(每磅29美分)的额定费用,这取决于货品的应计分量。这笔费用还需付出燃油附加费。收费规范有效期至3月29日。
3 Temu宣告与Checkout.com协作,优化数字付出体会
Temu宣告与Checkout.com树立协作伙伴关系,旨在优化网上购物者的数字付出体会。两边将凭借Checkout.com的全球付出网络及先进技能,为客户供应愈加优化且安全的结账流程。此次协作不只进步了付出功率,还增强了买卖的安全性,让顾客在购物过程中享用无忧的付出体会。
4 Temu与西班牙物流公司Correos达到战略协作,优化物流进步购物体会
电子商务巨子Temu宣告与西班牙物流公司Correos树立战略协作伙伴关系,旨在为西班牙卖家供应更高效的物流处理方案,一同让顾客享用更快、更灵敏的送货挑选。与Correos的协作将优化西班牙全境的配送服务,掩盖包含加那利群岛、巴利阿里群岛、休达和梅利利亚在内的偏远区域,并在战略地址供应快捷的订单提取服务。Temu发言人表明:“咱们的任务是向全世界供应物美价廉的产品。有了这个联盟,咱们将愈加坚定地致力于供应更快、更安全的送货服务,为客户带来更优质的购物体会。”
5 2025年集装箱航运业赢利估计下滑,关税与红海形势增加不确定性
据Sea-Intelligence剖析,上一年集装箱航运业息税前赢利总额达600亿美元,为前史第三高。但是,本年该职业赢利估计将下滑至100亿美元以下。闻名剖析师约翰•麦考恩指出,因为价格下降趋势继续,本年榜首季度成绩将低于上一年同期。特朗普新政府引发的关税形势添加了不确定性,世界清算银行正告称,关税和大规模裁人或许要挟世界经济软着陆。集装箱现货运价自年头以来已跌落47%,但相较于红海航运危机前水平仍有上涨。
克拉克森研讨公司谈论称,现货商场走弱布景是货运量低于平常、班轮公司竞赛加重及关税带来的不确定性。马士基猜测,2025年全球集装箱运量增加约4%,但盈亏要害取决于红海形势,其息税前赢利猜测从零到30亿美元不等。
# 职业方针与数据 #
1 杭州首票“TIR+跨境电商”货品顺畅发运
3月17日音讯,一批野外用品、首饰等上万件跨境电商产品近来以跨境电商9610清单形式报关,经钱江海关监管后,搭乘世界公路运送条约运送(TIR)车辆从杭州归纳保税区起程,经阿拉山口口岸出口莫斯科。这是杭州第一批“TIR+跨境电商”形式出口货品,是杭州跨境电商综试区“跨境电商新业态”与“TIR运送形式”相结合的初次探究,标志着钱塘跨境电商出口具有了一条新通道。
2 广西防城港加快布局AI+跨境工业,激起外商出资生机
广西防城港市官方发表,该市将加快布局“人工智能+”,将人工智能与跨境工业紧密结合,在协作才干、网络、机制等方面强化面向东盟的沟通,全面推动工业链供应链世界协作。防城港市在“优化营商环境日”新闻发布会发表,这座边境城市近年来加快建造边境经济协作区、我国(广西)自由买卖试验区协同开展区,大力创立国家跨境电子商务归纳试验区,构建面向东盟的跨境工业链。
官方核算,2024年,防城港市外贸进出口总额达1282.1亿元,同比增加28.6%,初次打破1200亿元大关。其间,出口总额313.8亿元,增加227.2%;进口总额968.3亿元,增加7.5%,出口增速、进口额均居广西首位。
3 美国海关CSMS公告系统布置更新,800美元豁免方针存变数
美国时刻3月17日,美国海关CSMS发布“商业环境(ACE)开发和布置方案”公告,显现布置时刻为2025年9月。此次系统布置核心内容包含:新增“估计抵达时刻”申报字段;单日/单人进口额超800美元限额时,ACE系统将宣告正告;豁免额内ACE严控不合规货品。公告更新了ACE第321节增强功用的方针布置日期,但为概念性时刻表,或许有所改变。
不少卖家以为此公告意味着800美元豁免方针有望延期至9月,但也有卖家指出,公告未清晰指出与撤销800美金关税豁免额有关,该方针仍或许随时撤销。关税风云继续发酵,跨境电商职业者逐步安静,部分卖家已做相应预备。
4 美政府拟对我国船只加征高额服务费,全球航运本钱或大幅上升
据外媒报导,美国买卖代表办公室(USTR)发布了一项拟对我国船只征收港口费用的提案,这一提案与此前美国对我国进口产品加征的20%关税一同,不只将推高全球海运本钱,损坏全球工业链和供应链的安稳,也加大美国国内的通胀压力,危害美国顾客和企业的利益。依据USTR的提案,由我国公司运营的船只若停靠美国港口,需交纳最高100万美元的服务费,或依照船只净吨位付出最高每吨1000美元的费用。此外,由我国制作的船只或许面对高达15亿美元的罚款,而假如某航运公司超越50%的新订单来自我国造船厂,则每次停靠美国港口还需付出最高100万美元的额定费用。
5 91%进口包裹来自我国,法国商业界呼吁加强监管
据外媒报导,近年来,法国商场上的进口包裹数量激增。2023年,法国共接纳24亿个进口包裹,而2024年这一数字上升至46亿个。其间,均匀每个包裹价值22欧元,约91%的货品来自我国。依照当时趋势,到2027年,每两件进口包裹中就有一件来自Temu或SHEIN。
因而,法国首要商业联合会在巴黎举行会议,敦促政府采纳办法,维护本乡企业免受亚洲电商途径Temu、SHEIN和TikTok Shop的冲击,一同重视美国对我国产品施加的关税压力或许带来的连锁反应。法国商业委员会(CDCF)表明,职业已对相关问题坚持耐性,但现在迫切需求政府的回应,并呼吁政府加大对这些途径的监管力度,特别是在顾客维护和反诈骗方面的查看。
6 菲律宾零售商协会呼吁对电商途径征收12%增值税
菲律宾零售商协会(PRA)近期敦促政府对包含TikTok在内的电商途径出售的实体产品征收12%的增值税(VAT),以消除与实体店之间的不公正竞赛。该协会指出,现在实体店东需交纳12%的增值税,而部分电商途径的网络卖家则无需交纳此税,这使得网络卖家在价格上占有优势。PRA呼吁政府从头点评最低极限规矩,并将网络卖家的税率调整至与实体店相同的水平。此外,菲律宾政府也在推动相关立法,以保证一切数字服务供货商(包含电商途径)在税收上与本地企业享用同等待遇。
7 菲律宾贸工部与Meta协作,加强在线商场监管
菲律宾买卖和工业部(DTI)宣告,已与Meta Platforms, Inc.达到协作,一起监控在线商场,冲击违规产品。DTI副部长阿加顿·特奥多罗·乌韦罗表明,铲除网上违规营销是当时的要害应战。此次协作将引进顾客方针途径(CPC),经过用户陈述、人工智能和人工审阅的多层次法律系统,追寻Facebook上的买卖,并敏捷处理违规行为。
DTI公正买卖法律局局长Regino D. Mallari, Jr.着重,此举不只维护顾客,也进步电子商务诚信度,推动可继续经济增加。此前,DTI已与TikTok、Shopee和Lazada等途径协作,并暂时制止电商途径出售电子烟产品,以避免未成年人购买。DTI表明,将继续与各方坚持敞开协作,采纳更全面的顾客维护办法。
8 我国电商途径在韩影响力扩展,韩政府监管作业组举动阻滞
近来,跟着速卖通、Temu、SHEIN等我国电商途径加快进入韩国商场,韩国政府树立的跨部门作业组(TES)举动却趋于阻滞。上一年5月,韩国政府曾提出制止未经KC认证的产品经过海外直购进入韩国,但因顾客激烈对立而敏捷撤回。
尔后,作业组仅举行了一次查看会议,且自上一年8月后再未举行任何正式会议。虽然作业组曾方案对“进口小额产品免税准则”进行查看,但相关谈论至今放置。现在,韩国顾客从我国海外直购的金额已达到4.77万亿韩元,占韩国海外直购总额的60%,较2020年大幅上升约40个百分点。但是,政府层面作业组的缓慢举动使得推动准则改革的阻力依然很大,我国电商职业在韩国的影响力却继续扩展。
【亿邦原创】Temu加快转型半保管;TikTok Shop敞开欧洲站点;亚马逊爱尔兰站敞开。收拾丨何欣欣曩昔一周,跨境电商范畴发生了这些事:# 途径意向 #【亚马逊】1 亚马逊爱尔兰站正式上线3月19...
华尔街见识
鲍威尔屡次着重,美联储将逐次会议做出决议方案,不会遭到商场对降息预期定价的影响,也不会考虑任何政治要素和议题,而是用“对其时(数据)适宜的速度或快或慢地采纳(降息)举动”。
鲍威尔意在着重,首要,美联储官员作出任何降息决议方案都会感觉其时的经济形势和数据而定,而现在通胀和作业的两大任务之间危险到达均衡,所以是时分敞开降息以提振劳动力商场了。
第二,美联储将逐次会议做出决议方案,不会遭到商场对降息预期定价的影响,也不会考虑任何政治要素和议题,而是用“对其时适宜的速度或快或慢地采纳举动”。
第三,鲍威尔不以为大幅降息阐明美国经济衰退挨近,也不阐明作业商场挨近溃散的边际,降息更多是一种防备性质的举动,目的是坚持住经济和劳动力商场“稳健”的现状。
第四,他供认非农作业或许下修,但依旧是个值得参阅的重要数据点,其他美联储重视的劳动力数据还包含:赋闲率、作业率、薪酬添加、职位空缺与赋闲人数的比值、辞去职务率等多项方针:
重点是,“问题不在于详细数字的水平几许”,而是在曩昔几个月情况产生了改动,美国通胀的上行危险的确在下降,作业的下行危险添加,所以现在美联储出手调整方针情绪支撑作业。
以下为华尔街见识收拾的鲍威尔9月FOMC大幅降息后记者会问答环节全记录:
问题1:Strong third quarter GDP running 3% so what changed to made the committee go 50. Andhow do you respond to the concerns that perhaps it shows the Fed is more concerned about the labor market, and I guess should we expect more 50s in the months ahead? And based on what should we make that call?
第三季度美国GDP估量微弱添加3%,那么是什么改动让美联储决议降息50个基点?这是否或许标明美联储更忧虑劳动力商场,未来也会持续每次降息50个基点?咱们应该依据什么做出这一判别?
答复1:
Let me jump in. So since the last meeting, we have had a lot of data come in. We‘ve had the two employment reports July and August. We’ve also had two inflation reports, including one that came in during blackout. We had the QCW report, which suggests that the payroll report numbers that we‘re getting may be artificially high and will be revised down. You know that we’ve also seen that anecdotal data like the Beige Book, so we took all of those, and we went into blackout, and we thought about what to do, and we cleared that this was the right thing for the economy, for the people that we serve, and that‘s how we made our decision. So that’s one question.
自前次会议以来,咱们收到了许多数据,有7月和8月的两份非农作业陈述,还有两份通胀陈述,其间一份是在美联储官员静默期内发布的。还有QCW陈述标明咱们非农新增作业数或许被人为举高,将会被下调。咱们也看到了像美联储褐皮书这样的轶事数据,所以咱们收集了一切这些数据,然后进入揭露说话的静默期,咱们考虑该怎么做,并清晰了这对经济、对咱们服务的美国人民来说是正确的,这便是咱们做出决议的办法。
So a couple things, a good place to start is the SEP. But let me start with what I said, which was that we‘re going to be making decisions, meeting by meeting, based on the incoming data, the evolving outlook, the balance of risks. If you look at the SEP, you’ll see that it‘s a process of recalibrating our policy stance, away from where we had a year ago, when inflation was high and unemployment low, to a place that’s more appropriate given where we are now and where we expect to be. And that process will take place over time. There‘s nothing in the SEP that suggests the committee is in a rush to get this done. This this process evolves over time.
(关于未来利率途径的判别),一个好的起点是看经济猜想摘要SEP。首要,咱们将依据收到的数据、不断改动的远景和危险平衡,在逐次会议上做出决议。看看 SEP你会发现,这是一个从头校准咱们方针情绪的进程,远离一年前通胀高+赋闲率低的情绪,转向一个更合适其时情况和咱们预期的情绪。这个进程将跟着时刻的推移而产生。SEP中没有任何内容标明委员会急于完结(降息)这项作业,这个进程是跟着时刻的推移而开展的。
Of course, that‘s a projection. That’s a baseline projection. We know, as I mentioned in my remarks, that the actual things that we do will depend on the way the economy evolves. We can go quicker, if that‘s appropriate, we can go slower if that’s appropriate. We can pause if that‘s appropriate. But that’s what we‘re contemplating. Again, I would point you to the SEP as just an assessment of where, what the committee is thinking today, but the individual members, rather, of the committee, are thinking today, assuming that their particular forecasts take, you know, are realized.
当然,这仅仅一个猜想。这是一个基线猜想。正如我在说话中说到的,咱们实践做的作业将取决于经济的开展办法。假如适宜,咱们能够加速(降息)速度,假如适宜,咱们能够怠慢速度。假如适宜,咱们能够暂停。但这便是咱们正在考虑的。再次,我想指出,SEP仅仅对委员会今日的主意的评价,而且是委员会的各位成员今日的主意,假定他们特定的猜想得以完成。
问题2: The projections show that the Fed officials expect the Fed funds rate to still be above their estimate of long run neutral by the end of next year. So does that suggest you see rates as restrictive for that entire period? Does that threaten the weakening of the job market you said you‘d like to avoid, or does it suggest that maybe people see the short run neutral as a little bit higher?
猜想显现,美联储官员估量到下一年年末联邦基金利率仍将高于他们对长时刻中性利率的估量。那么这是否意味着您以为利率在整个时期内都是有限制性的?这是否要挟到您所说期望防止的作业商场疲软,是否也意味着人们或许以为短期中性利率会略高一些?
答复2::
I would really characterize it as this. I think people write down their estimate. Individuals do. I think every single person on the committee, if you ask them, what‘s your level of certainty around that, and they would say there’s a wide range where that could fall. So I think we don‘t know there are model based approaches and empirically based approaches that estimate what the neutral rate will be at any given time. But realistically, we know it by its works. So that leaves us in a place where we’ll be, where we expect, in the base case, to be continuing to remove restriction, and we‘ll be looking at the way the economy reacts to that, and that will be guiding us in our thinking about the question that we’re asking at every meeting, which is, is our policy stance the appropriate one?
我真的会这样描绘它。这是委员会每个官员个人的预估值,假如你问他们对此的确认程度怎么,他们会说,这个规划或许很大。所以我以为咱们不知道是否有依据模型的办法和依据阅历的办法能够估量任何给定时刻的中性利率。但实践上,咱们通过它的作业原理来了解它。因而,在底子场景下,咱们估量会持续放松钱银方针,咱们将重视经济对此的反响,这将辅导咱们考虑在每次会议上提出的问题,即咱们的方针情绪是否适宜?
We know, if you go back, we know that the policy stance we adopted in July of 2023 came at a time when unemployment was three and a half percent and inflation was 4.2%. Today, unemployment is up to 4.2%, inflation is down to a few tenths above 2%, so we know that it is time to recalibrate our policy to Something that is more appropriate given the progress on inflation and on employment moving to a more sustainable level. So the balance of risks are now even, and this is the beginning of that process I mentioned, the direction of which is toward a sense of neutral, and we‘ll move as fast or as slow as we think is appropriate in real time, what you have is our individual accumulation of individual estimates of what that will be in the base case.
咱们知道,假如回忆一下,咱们会发现在2023年7月采纳的方针情绪是在赋闲率为3.5%和通胀率为 4.2%时采纳的。现在,赋闲率已升至 4.2%,通胀率降至更挨近2%,因而咱们知道,鉴于通胀和作业向更可持续水平跨进的开展,现在是时分从头调整咱们的方针,使其更适宜。因而,危险平衡现在已均衡,这是我说到的那个进程的初步,其方向是朝着中立的方向开展,咱们将依据咱们以为对其时适宜的速度或快或慢地采纳举动,点阵图是联储官员对底子场景的个人估量值。
问题3:How close was this in terms of the decision, you do have the first dissent by a governor since 2005 I think was the weight clearly in favor of a 50, or was this a very close decision?
这是自 2005 年以来第一次有联储理事提出异议,降息50个基点的一致定见有多少?
答复3:
I think we had a good discussion. You know, if you go back, I talked about this at Jackson Hole, but I didn‘t address the question of the size of the cut. And I think we left it open going into blackout. And so there was a lot of discussion back and forth. Good diversity of division. Excellent discussion today. I think there was also broad support for the decision that the committee voted on. So I would add, though, look at the SEP all 19 of the participants wrote down multiple cuts this year, all 19. That’s a big change from June, right? 17 of the 19 wrote down three or more cuts, and 10 of the 19 wrote down four more cuts. So, you know, there is a dissent, and there‘s a range of views, but there’s actually a lot of common ground as well.
我以为咱们进行了很好的谈论。我在杰克逊霍尔谈到了这个问题,但我没有答复降息起伏的问题。我以为咱们在静默期之前没有处理这个问题。因而,咱们进行了许多的谈论。观念有多样性很好。今日的谈论十分精彩。我以为委员会投票通过的决议也得到了广泛的支撑。我想弥补一点,看看 SEP,一切19名参加者支撑本年屡次降息,这与6月份比较有很大改动,19人中有17人支撑本年降息3 次或更多,有10人支撑4次以上的降息。所以,存在不同定见,也有各种观念,但实践上也有许多共同点。
问题4: on the pacing here, would you expect this to be running every other meeting?
依照这样的节奏,您是否以为每隔一次会议都会进行这样(大幅降息)的谈论?
答复4:Once we get into next year, we‘re going to take it meeting by meeting, as I mentioned, we would. There’s no sense that the committee feels it‘s in a rush to do this. We made a good, strong start to this. And that’s really, frankly, a sign of our confidence, confidence in inflation is coming down toward 2% on a sustainable basis. That gives us the ability we can, you know, make a good, strong start. But, and I‘m very pleased that we did to me the logic of this, both from an economic standpoint and also from a risk management standpoint, was clear, but I think we’re going to go carefully meeting by meeting and make our decisions as we go.
一旦进入下一年,咱们将逐次会议谈论此事,正如我之前说到的那样。委员会不会急于这样做(降降息)。咱们现已取得了杰出的初步。坦率地说,这的确标明晰咱们的决心,信任通胀率将以可持续的办法下降到 2%。这让咱们有才干取得杰出的初步。可是,我很快乐咱们做到了,不管是从经济视点仍是从危险办理视点来看,这其间的逻辑都很清晰,但我以为咱们将在每次会议上都慎重行事,并跟着时刻推动做出决议。
问题5:Your colleagues in your economic projections today see the unemployment rate climbing to 4.4% and staying there, obviously, historically, when the unemployment rate climbs that much over a relatively short period of time, it doesn‘t typically just stop. It continues increasing. And so I wonder if you can walk us through why you see the labor market stabilizing sort of, what’s the mechanism there, and what do you see as the risks?
您的搭档在今日的经济猜想中猜想赋闲率将攀升至4.4%并坚持在这个水平,明显,从历史上看,当赋闲率在相对较短的时刻内攀升到这个水平常,它一般不会中止,而是会持续上升。所以为什么您以为劳动力商场会趋于安稳,其间的机制是什么,您以为存在哪些危险?
答复5:
So again, the labor market is actually in solid condition, and our intention with our policy move today is to keep it there. You can say that about the whole economy. The US economy is in good shape. It‘s growing at a solid pace. Inflation is coming down. The labor market is in a strong pace. We want to keep it there that’s what we‘re doing.
所以,劳动力商场实践上处于稳健情况,咱们今日采纳方针举动的目的是坚持这种情况。你能够说整个经济都是如此。美国经济情况杰出。它正以稳健的速度增,通胀正在下降,劳动力商场开展微弱。咱们期望坚持这种情况,这便是咱们正在做的作业。
问题6:“新美联储通讯社”Nick Timiraos的发问,鉴于近期作业数据的大幅批改,今日的举动是否构成追逐,或许这次比典型降息起伏更大的降息是方针利率名义水平上升的成果,因而能够预期加速降息的节奏将持续下去?
答复6:
multiple questions in every list. So I would say we don‘t think we’re behind. We do not think we‘re. We think this is timely, but I think you can take this as a sign of our commitment not to get behind. So it’s a strong move.
咱们不以为咱们落后(于曲线)了。咱们以为这是及时的(降息),但我以为你能够把这看作是咱们许诺不落后(于曲线)的标志。所以这是一个强有力的举动。
I think it‘s about we come into this with a policy position that was put in place. As you know, I mentioned in July of 2023 which was a time of high inflation and very low unemployment, we’ve been very patient about reducing the policy rate. We‘ve waited. Other central banks around the world have cut many of them several times. We’ve waited, and I think that that patience has really paid dividends in the form of our confidence that inflation is moving sustainably under 2% so I think that is what enables us to take this strong move today.
我以为,关键在于咱们以既定的方针情绪来应对这一问题。如你所知,我说到,2023年7月是高通胀和低赋闲率时期,咱们一向十分耐性肠等候下降方针利率的机遇。咱们一向在等候。世界各地的其他央行现已屡次降息,但美联储一向在等候,我以为这种耐性的确带来了报答,咱们有决心通胀率将持续低于 2%,所以我以为这便是咱们今日能够采纳这一有力举动的原因。
I do not think that anyone should look at this and say, Oh, this is the new pace. You know, you have to think about it in terms of the base case. Of course, what happens will happen. So in the base case, what you see is, look at the SEP you see cuts moving along. The sense of this is we‘re recalibrating policy down over time to a more neutral level, and we’re moving at the pace that we think is appropriate given developments in the economy. And the base case, the economy can develop in a way that would cause us to go faster or slower, but that‘s what the base case says.
我以为,任何人都不应该看到这一点就说,哦,(降息50个基点)这是新的节奏。你知道,你有必要从底子场景的视点来考虑。当然,该产生的事总会产生。所以在底子情况下,你看到的是,看看 SEP,你会看到降息在进行。这意味着咱们正在跟着时刻的推移将方针从头调整到更中性的水平,咱们正在以咱们以为合适经济开展的脚步行进。在底子场景下,经济开展的办法或许会导致咱们走得更快或更慢,但这便是底子场景所说的。
问题7: If I could follow up on the balance sheet in 2019 when you did the mid cycle adjustment, you ceased the balance sheet runoff with a larger cut. Today, is there any should there be any signal inferred about how the committee would approach end state on the balance sheet policy?
有关2019年的资产负债表,其时您进行了中期周期调整,中止了资产负债表减缩,并进行了更大的降息。今日,是否有任何信号能够揣度委员会将怎么处理资产负债表方针的终究情况?
答复7:
So in the current situation, reserves have really been stable. They haven‘t come down. So reserves are still abundant and expected to remain so for some time. As you know, the shrinkage in our balance sheet has really come out of the overnight. RFP, so I think what that tells you is we’re not thinking about stopping runoff because of this at all. We know that these two things can happen side by side, in a sense, they‘re both a form of normalization. And so for a time, you can have the balance sheet shrink, you would also be cutting rates.
因而,在其时情况下,银行储备金的确很安稳。它们没有下降。因而储备金依然足够,估量还会持续一段时刻。如您所知,咱们的资产负债表的减缩的确是一夜之间产生的。咱们底子没有考虑会中止缩表。咱们知道这两件事(降息+缩表)能够一同产生,从某种含义上说,它们都是一种正常化方式。因而,在一段时刻内,您能够减缩资产负债表,一同还能够下降利率。
问题8: just following up on rising unemployment, is it your view that this is just a function of a normalizing labor market? amid improved supply, or is there anything to suggest that something more concerning, perhaps is taking place here given that other metrics of labor demand have softened. is do you not? Why should we not expect a further deterioration in labor market conditions if policy is still restricted?
跟进赋闲率上升的问题,您是否以为这仅仅劳动力商场正常化的成果?供给添加,仍是有什么痕迹标明,鉴于劳动力需求的其他方针现已削弱,或许正在产生更令人担忧的作业?您不这么以为吗?假如利率方针依然具有限制性,为什么咱们不应该预期劳动力商场情况会进一步恶化?
答复8:
So I think what we‘re seeing is clearly labor market conditions have cooled off by any measure, as I talked about in Jackson Hole and but they’re still at a level. The level of those conditions is actually pretty close to what I would call maximum employment, you know. So you‘re close to mandate, maybe at mandate on that. So what’s driving it? Clearly, payroll job creation has moved down over the last few months, and this bears watching, meant by many other measures, the labor market has returned to or below 2019 levels, which was a very good, strong labor market, but this is more sort of 2018、2017. So the labor market bears close watching, and we‘ll be giving it that but ultimately, we think, we believe, with an appropriate recalibration of our policy that we can continue to see the economy growing and that will support the labor market in the meantime, if you look at the growth and economic activity data, retail sales data that we just got, second quarter GDP, all of this indicates an economy that is still growing at a solid pace, So that should also support the labor market over time.
很明显,不管以何种规范衡量,劳动力商场情况都现已降温,就像我在杰克逊霍尔会议上谈到的那样,但它们依然处于必定水平。这些条件的水平实践上十分挨近我所说的充分作业。所以挨近美联储的法定任务,或许现已到达法定任务了。那么是什么推动了它呢?明显,作业岗位发明在曩昔几个月有所下降,这值得重视,从许多其他方针来看,劳动力商场现已回到或低于 2019 年的水平,其时是一个十分好、微弱的劳动力商场,但现在更像是 2018 年、2017 年的情况。因而,劳动力商场需求亲近重视,咱们也会给予重视,但终究,咱们信任,通过恰当调整方针,咱们能够持续看到经济添加,这将支撑劳动力商场,与此一同,假如你看看添加和经济活动数据、咱们刚刚得到的零售额数据、第二季度的GDP,一切这些都标明美国经济仍在稳步添加,因而这也应该会跟着时刻的推移支撑劳动力商场。
So, but again we‘re watching, and just on the point about starting to see rising layoffs. If that were to happen, wouldn’t the committee already be too late in terms of avoiding a recession?
诘问:所以,咱们再次重视,而且正值裁人人数初步上升之际。假如产生这种情况,委员会在防止经济衰退方面是否现已太迟了?
So we‘re, that’s, you know, our plan, of course, has been to begin to recalibrate, and we‘re not seeing rising claims, we’re not seeing rising layoffs, we‘re not seeing that, and we’re not hearing that from companies that that‘s something that’s getting ready to happen. So we‘re not waiting for that because, you know, there is thinking that the time to support the labor market is when it’s strong, and not when you begin to see the White House. There‘s some more on that. So that’s the situation we‘re in. We have, in fact, begun the cutting cycle now, and we’ll be watching, and that will be one of the factors that we consider. Of course, we‘re going to look at the totality of the data as we make these decisions, meeting by meeting.
咱们的方案当然是初步从头调整方针,咱们没有看到赋闲救助请求数量上升,也没有看到裁人人数上升,也没有听到公司说这些作业行将产生。所以咱们不会等候,由于,有人以为,支撑劳动力商场的最佳机遇是当它微弱时。关于这一点,还有更多内容。这便是咱们所在的情况。现实上,咱们现在现已初步了降息周期,咱们会亲近重视(劳动力商场降温),这将是咱们考虑的要素之一。当然,在每次会议上,咱们都会检查一切数据,然后做出这些决议。
问题9:what would constitute for you and the committee a deterioration in the labor market you‘re pricing in, basically, by the end of next year, 200 basis points of cuts just to maintain a higher unemployment Rate. Would you be moving to a more preemptive monetary policy style, rather than, as you did with inflation, waiting until the data gave you a signal
什么会对您和委员会构成“劳动力商场的恶化”?您以为,到下一年末,降息200个基点仅仅为了坚持较高的赋闲率。您会采纳更具先下手为强的钱银方针风格吗?而不是像您在通胀问题上所做的那样,比及数据给您一个信号再举动。
答复9:
we‘re going to be watching all of the data, right? So if, as I mentioned in my remarks, if the labor market were to slow unexpectedly, then we have the ability to react to that by cutting faster. We’re also going to be looking at our other mandate. Though we have greater confidence now that inflation is moving down to 2% but at the same time, our plan is that we will be at 2% over time. So and policy we think is still restrictive, so that should still be happening.
咱们会重视一切数据,因而,假如劳动力商场意外放缓,咱们有才干通过加速降息来应对。咱们还将重视另一个通胀的任务。虽然咱们现在更有决心通胀率正降到2%,但与此一同,咱们的方案是跟着时刻的推移通胀率将到达 2%。因而,咱们以为方针依然具有限制性,因而应该仍会如此。
I‘m just curious as to how sensitive you’ll be to the labor market, since you forecast we are going to see higher unemployment, and it is going to take a significant amount of monetary easing to just maintain it.
诘问:我仅仅猎奇您对劳动力商场的敏感度怎么,由于您猜想咱们将会看到更高的赋闲率,而且需求许多的钱银宽松方针才干坚持这种情况。
So you know what I would say is we don‘t think we need to see further losing in labor market conditions to get inflation down to 2% but we have a dual mandate. And I think you can take this, this whole action as takes take a step back. What have we been trying to achieve? We’re trying to achieve a situation where we restore price stability without the kind of painful increase in unemployment that has come sometimes with disinflation. That‘s what we’re trying to do, and I think you can take today‘s action as a sign of our strong commitment to achieve that goal.
我想说的是,咱们以为咱们不需求看到劳动力商场情况进一步恶化来把通胀率降至2%,但咱们有两层任务。我以为你能够把这整个举动看作是退一步考虑。咱们一向在极力完成什么方针?咱们正极力完成一种局势,即康复价格安稳,而不会呈现有时随同通货紧缩而来的那种苦楚的赋闲率上升。这便是咱们正在极力做的作业,我以为你能够把今日的举动看作是咱们完成这一方针的坚决许诺的标志。
问题10:You‘re describing this view that you don’t think you‘re behind when it comes to the job market. Can you walk us through the specific data points that you found to be most helpful in the discussions at this meeting? You mentioned a couple, but would you be able to walk us through what that dashboard told you as far as what you know about the job market now?
您描绘了这种观念,即美联储以为自己在作业商场方面并不落后。能向咱们介绍一下您以为在本次会议谈论中最有帮忙的详细数据点吗?您说到了几个,其时作业商场还有哪些信息去重视?
答复10:
Sure. So start with unemployment, which is the single most important one. Probably you‘re at 4.2% that’s, you know, I know that‘s higher than we were. We were used to seeing numbers in the mid and even below mid threes last year. But if you look back over the sweep of the years, that’s a low, that‘s a very healthy unemployment rate. And anything in the low fours is, A, really, is a good labor market. So that’s one thing. Participation is at high levels, it‘s, you know, we’ve had, we‘re right adjusted for demographics, for aging, participation, said, at pretty high levels, that’s a good thing. Wages are still a bit above what would be their wage increases. Rather, are still just a bit above where they would be over the very longer term to be consistent with 2% inflation, but they‘re very much coming down to what that sustainable level is. So we feel good about that. Vacancies over per unemployed is back to what is still a very strong level. It’s not as high as it was. That number reached two to one, two vacancies for every unemployed person as measured, it‘s now around one, but that’s still, that‘s still a very good number. I would say quits have come back down to normal levels. I mean, that could go on and on there.
首要是赋闲率,这是最重要的一个要素。赋闲率4.2%比上一年要高,曩昔赋闲率在3%的中段或更低,假如回忆这些年,你会发现这是一个很低、十分健康的赋闲率。任何低于4%的赋闲率都标明劳动力商场情况杰出。这是一方面。作业参加率处于高水平,咱们现已依据人口统计学、老龄化等要素进行了调整,作业参加率处于恰当高的水平,这是件功德。薪酬仍略高于应有的薪酬添加水平,更切当地说,仍略高于与2%通胀率坚持一致的长时刻薪酬添加水平,但它们正在逐步降至可持续水平。所以咱们对此感到满足。每名赋闲人员对应的空缺职位数下降,但仍是十分微弱的水平,没有曾经那么高了,曾经到达二比一,即每名赋闲者对应两个职位空缺,现在大约是一比一,这仍是一个十分好的数字。辞去职务率现已回落到正常水平,这种情况或许会一向持续下去。
There are many, many employment indicators. What do they say? They say this is still a solid labor market. The question isn‘t the level. The question is that there has been change over, particularly over the last few months, and you know, so what we say is, as the upside risk to inflation have really come down, the downside risk to employment have increased , and because we have been patient and held our fire on cutting wall inflate While inflation has come down. I think we’re now in a very good position to manage the risks to both of our goals.
作业方针有许多。它们怎么说呢?它们说这依然是一个安定的劳动力商场。问题不在于水平。问题在于,特别是在曩昔几个月里,情况产生了改动,所以咱们说,跟着通胀的上行危险的确下降,作业的下行危险添加了,由于咱们一向坚持耐性,在通胀下降的一同,操控通胀。我以为咱们现在处于十分有利的方位,能够办理咱们两个任务各自面对的危险。
And what do you expect to learn between now and November that will help inform the scale of the cut of the next meeting?
诘问:您期望从现在到 11 月之间了解到哪些信息,以帮忙确认下次会议的降息起伏?
You know, more data. The usual. Don‘t look for anything else. We’ll see another labor report. We‘ll see another jobs report. I think we get. We actually, we could to, we get a second jobs report on the day of the meeting. I think, no, no, on the Friday before the meeting. So and inflation data we’ll get, we‘ll get all this data we’ll be watching. You know, it‘s always a question of, look at the incoming data and ask, what are the implications of that data for the evolving outlook and the balance of risks? And then go through our process and think, what’s the right thing to do? Is policy where we want it to be, to foster the achievement of our goals over time. So that‘s what it is, and that’s what we‘ll be doing.
你知道,更多的数据。和平常相同。不要再寻觅其他东西了。咱们将看到两份劳动力陈述,咱们还将取得通胀数据,即一切这些咱们将重视的数据。你知道,这总是一个问题,看看传入的数据,并问,这些数据对不断改动的远景和危险平衡有何影响?然后通过咱们的流程考虑,什么是正确的做法?方针是否契合咱们的期望,是否有助于完成咱们的方针。所以这便是咱们要做的。
问题11:we‘ve only been running a little above 100,000 jobs a month on payrolls last three months. Do you view that level of job creation as worrying or alarming, or would you be would you be content if we were to kind of stick at that level? And relatedly, one of the welcome trends over the last couple of years has been labor market steam coming out through job openings, falling rather than job losses. Do you think that trend has further to run? Or do you see risk that further labor market cooling will have to come through job losses?
曩昔三个月,咱们每月新增作业岗位仅略高于10万个。您以为这种作业岗位添加水平令人担忧或宣告警报吗?或许,假如咱们一向坚持这种水平,您会感到满足吗?与此相关的是,曩昔几年中令人欢喜的趋势之一是劳动力商场热度通过职位空缺释放出来,而不是职位削减。您以为这种趋势会持续下去吗?或许,您是否以为劳动力商场进一步降温的危险将不得不通过职位削减来完成?
答复11:
So on the job creation, it depends on the inflows, right? So if you‘re having millions of people come into the labor force then, and you’re creating 100,000 jobs, you‘re going to see unemployment go up. So it really depends on what’s the trend underlying the volatility of people coming into the country. We understand there‘s been quite an influx across the borders, and that has actually been one of the things that’s allowed unemployment rate to rise as and the other thing is just the slower hiring rate, which is something we also watch carefully. So it does depend on what‘s happening on the supply side and on the curve.
作业发明取决于人口流入作业商场,所以,假如稀有百万人进入劳动力商场,而且只发明了10万个作业岗位,那么赋闲率就会上升。所以,这实践上取决于流入该国的人口动摇背面的趋势。咱们知道跨境移民流入量恰当大,这实践上是导致赋闲率上升的原因之一,另一个要素是招聘速度放缓,这也是咱们亲近重视的要素。所以,这的确取决于供给方面和供需曲线的情况。
So we all felt on the committee, not all, but I think everyone on the committee felt that job openings were so elevated that they could fall a long way before you hit the part of the curve where job openings turned into higher unemployment, job loss. And yes, I mean, I think we are. It‘s hard to know that. You can’t know these things with great precision, but certainly it appears that we‘re very close to that point, if not at it so that further declines in job openings will translate more directly into into unemployment. But it’s been, it‘s been a great ride down. I mean, we’ve seen a lot of of tightness come out of the labor market in that form without it resulting in lower employment.
因而,我以为委员会的每个人都以为,职位空缺数量如此之高,所以能够长时刻下降直到传导称更高的赋闲率上升。很难知道何时到达这一点。你不或许十分精确地知道这些作业,但能够必定的是,咱们十分挨近那个点,乃至现在都或许就在这个点上了,那么职位空缺的进一步削减将更直接地转化为赋闲。但这是一个巨大的下降进程。我的意思是,咱们现已看到劳动力商场以这种方式缓解了许多严峻局势,但并没有导致作业率下降。
问题12:so we‘ve heard some speculation that you may be going with the federal funds rate to three and a half, maybe under 4% and there’s basically an entire generation that has experienced zero or near zero federal fund rate as something we‘re heading in that direction. Again. What’s the likelihood that cheap money is now the norm?
咱们听到一些猜想,称联邦基金利率或许会降至 3.5%,或许低于 4%,而底子上整整一代人都阅历过零或挨近零的联邦基金利率,咱们正朝着这个方向行进。廉价钱银/超低利率从头成为常态的或许性有多大?
答复12:
So this is a question. You mean, after we get through all of this, it‘s just great question that we just we can only speculate about. Intuitively, most many, many people anyway, would say we’re probably not going back to that era where there were trillions of dollars of sovereign bonds trading at negative rates, long term bonds trading at negative rates. And it looked like the neutral rate was might even be negative. So there was people were issuing debt, issuing debt at negative rates. It seems that‘s so far away. Now, my own sense is that that we’re not going back to that, but you know, honestly, we‘re going to find out. But you know, it feels, it feels to me and that the neutral rate is is probably significantly higher than it was back then. How high is it? I just don’t think we know it‘s again, we only know it by its works.
咱们只能对此进行估测。直觉上,大多数人会说,咱们或许不会回到那个年代,当地稀有万亿美元的主权债券以负利率买卖,长时刻债券以负利率买卖,而且其时看起来中性利率乃至或许为负。所以有人在以负利率发行债款。这好像间隔现在现已很遥远了。我的感觉是咱们不会回到那个年代,我感觉中性利率或许比其时高得多。它有多高?我也不知道,只能通过它的作业来了解它。
One more, how do you respond to the criticism that will likely come that a deeper rate cut now before the election, has some political motivations.
诘问:还有一个问题,您怎么回应或许呈现的批判,即在选举前大幅降息是出于某些政治动机?
Yeah, so, you know, this is my fourth presidential election at the at the Fed, and you know, it‘s always the same. We’re always, we‘re always going into this meeting in particular and asking, what’s the right thing to do for the people we serve. And we do that, and we make a decision as a group, and then we announce it, and it‘s that’s always what it is. It‘s never about anything else. Nothing else is discussed. And I would also point out that the things that we do really affect economic conditions for the most part with with a lag. So nonetheless, this is what we do. Our job is to support the economy on behalf of the American people, and if we get it right, this will benefit the American people significantly. So this really concentrates the mind, and it’s something we all take very, very seriously. We don‘t put up any other filters. I think if you start doing that, I don’t know where you stop. And so we just want to do that.
这是我在美联储第四次阅历美国总统大选,你知道,总是相同。咱们总是问自己,对咱们服务的美国人民来说,什么是正确的作业。咱们这样做,咱们作为一个集体做出决议,然后咱们宣告它,它总是如此。它从不触及其他任何作业。没有其他谈论。我还要指出的是,咱们所做的作业的确在很大程度上影响了经济情况,而且存在滞后作用。所以虽然如此,这便是咱们的作业。咱们的作业是代表美国人民支撑经济,假如咱们做对了,这将极大地谋福美国人民。所以这真的让咱们会集注意力,这是咱们都十分十分重视的作业。咱们没有设置任何其他过滤器。不然假如你初步这样做,我不知道你会在哪里停下来。
问题13:My first question is,very simply, what message are you trying to send American consumers, the American people with this unusually large rate cut?
我的第一个问题很简单:通过这次不同寻常的大幅降息,您想向美国顾客、美国人民传达什么信息?
答复13:
I would just say that, you know, the US economy is in a good place and and our decision today is designed to keep it there. More specifically, the economy is growing at a solid pace. Inflation is coming down closer to our 2% objective over time, and the labor market is is still in solid shape. So our intention is really to maintain the strength that we currently see in the US economy, and we‘ll do that by returning rates from their high level, which has really been the purpose of which has been to get inflation under control. We’re going to move those down over time to a more normal level over time,
我只想说,美国经济情况杰出,咱们今日的决议旨在坚持这种情况。更详细地说,经济正在稳步添加。跟着时刻的推移,通胀正在下降挨近咱们2%的方针,劳动力商场依然情况杰出。所以咱们的目的实践上是坚持咱们现在看到的美国经济的微弱气势,咱们将通过把利率从高位拉低来完成这一方针,坚持利率高位的目的是操控通胀。咱们将跟着时刻推移将利率降至更正常的水平。
just a follow up to that, listening to you talk about inflation moving meaningfully down to 2% is the Federal Reserve effectively declaring a decisive victory over inflation and rising prices.
诘问:听您议论通胀率大幅下降至2%,这实践上意味着美联储在对立通胀和物价上涨方面取得了决议性的成功吗?
No, we‘re not so inflation. You know what we say is we want inflation. The goal is to have inflation move down to 2% on a sustainable basis. And, you know, we’re not really, we‘re close, but we’re not really at 2% and I think we‘re going to want to see it be, you know, around 2% and close to 2% for some time, but we’re certainly not doing, we‘re not we’re not saying mission accomplished or anything like that. But I have to say, though we‘re encouraged by the progress that we have made.
不,咱们不会那么忧虑通胀。咱们想要(必定程度的)通货膨胀。方针是让通胀率可持续地降至 2%。但咱们现在没有真实到达2%,或许会在一段时刻内挨近2%,所以咱们不会说(抗击通胀的)任务现已完结了这种话。但我有必要说,咱们对所取得的开展感到鼓动。
问题14:
我仅仅想知道委员会怎么看待咱们所看到的持续的住宅通胀,您以为住宅通胀率这么高,全体通胀能回到2%方针吗?
答复14:
Yeah, so housing inflation is the is the one piece that is kind of dragging a bit. If I can say we know that market rents are doing what we would want them to do, which is to be moving up at relatively low levels, but they‘re not rolling over that the leases that are rolling over are not coming down as much, and OER is coming in high. So, you know, it’s been slower than we expected. I think we now understand that it‘s going to take some time for those lower market rents to get into this. But, you know, the direction of travel is clear, and as long as market rents remain, you know, relatively low inflation over time that will show up just the time it’s taking now, several years, rather than just one or two cycles of of annual lease renewals. So that‘s, I think we understand that now, I don’t think the outcome is in doubt again. As long as market rents remain under control, the outcome is not as in doubt. So I would say it‘s the rest of the rest of the portfolio, of the elements that go into core, PCE, inflation or have behaved pretty well. You know, they’re all they all have some volatility. We will get down to 2% inflation, I believe, and I believe that ultimately, we‘ll get what we need to get out of the housing services piece too, some of your colleagues have experienced concern.
是的,住宅通胀是一个有点连累的要素。不过现在商场租金正在做咱们期望它们做的作业,即在相对较低的水平添加,可是续约房子的租金并没有下降那么多,而OER却很高。所以,住宅通胀降温的速度比咱们预期要慢。我以为咱们现在了解,那些较低的商场租金需求一段时刻才干发挥作用。可是,行进的方向是清晰的,只需商场租金坚持相对较低的通胀,跟着时刻推移,拉低通胀的作用就会显现出来,这需求几年,而不仅仅是一两个年度租约续签周期。所以,我不会因而质疑通胀降温。只需商场租金坚持受控,成果就不会有疑问,别的,经济数据的其他部分,包含中心PCE通胀等体现都恰当不错。你知道,它们都有必定的动摇性。我信任,咱们的通胀率会降到 2%,我信任,终究,咱们也会从住宅服务部分取得所需的收益。
It‘s hard to gain that out. The housing market is in part frozen because of lock in with low rates. People don’t want to sell their homes, so because they have a very low mortgage to be quite expensive to refinance. As rates come down, people will start to move more, and that‘s probably beginning to happen already. But remember, when that happens, you’ve got a you‘ve got a seller, but you’ve also got a new buyer, in many cases. So it‘s not, you know, obvious how much additional demand that would make me the real issue with housing is that we have had and are on track to continue to have not enough housing. And so it’s going to be challenging. It‘s hard to find to zone lots that are in places where people want to live. It’s all of the aspects of housing are more and more difficult. And you know, where are we going to get the supply? And this is not something that the Fed can can really fix, but I think as we normalize rates, you‘ll see the housing market normalize. And I mean ultimately, by getting inflation broadly down and getting those rates normalized and getting the housing housing cycle normalized, that’s the best thing we can do for householders. And then the supply question will have to be dealt with by the market and also by government.
乃至,你知道,这种情况产生的或许性有多大?你会怎么应对房地产商场?很难知道。房地产商场(的供给量)在必定程度上被之前人们确定的低利率所冻住。人们不想卖掉他们的房子,由于他们的典当借款利率很低,而再融资的本钱恰当高。跟着利率下降,人们将初步更多地搬迁,这或许现已初步产生了。但请记住,当这种情况产生时,你有一个卖家,但在许多情况下,你也会有一个新买家。所以,你知道,有多少额定的需求会让我感到不明显。住宅的真实问题是,咱们现已具有并将持续具有缺乏的住宅供给。所以这将是一个应战。很难找到人们想住的当地的分区地块。住宅的一切方面都越来越困难。你知道,咱们要从哪里取得供给?这不是美联储能够真实处理的问题,但我以为跟着利率正常化,你会看到房地产商场正常化。我的意思是,终究,通过下降通货膨胀率、使利率正常化、使住宅周期正常化,这是咱们能为家庭做的最好的作业。然后,供给问题有必要由商场和政府来处理。
问题15:Just following up on some of the labor market talk earlier. You know, monetary policy operates with long and variable lags, and I‘m wondering how much you see being able to keep the unemployment rate from rate right raising too much comes from the fact that you’re starting to act now, and that‘s going to give people more room to run, versus just the labor market is strong. And then also, if I could following up on next question, do you see today’s 50 basis point move as partially a response to the fact that you didn‘t cut in July, and that sort of gets you to the same place.
钱银方针的运作具有长时刻和可变的滞后性,我想知道你以为能够阻挠赋闲率上升太多的程度有多大,这要归功于你现在初步采纳举动,这将给人们更多的回旋余地,而不是仅仅由于劳动力商场微弱。然后,假如我能够跟进下一个问题,你是否以为今日降息50个基点是对你在7月没有降息这一现实的回应和补偿?
答复15:
So you‘re right about lags, but I would just point to the overall economy. You have an economy that is growing at a at a solid pace. If you look at forecasters or talk to companies, they’ll say that they think 2025 should be a good year too. So there‘s no sense in the US economy. Basically fine, if you talk to market participants. I mean, I mean, you know, business people who are actually out there doing business. So I think, you know, I think we, I think our move is timely. I do. And as I said, you can, you can see our, our our 50 basis point move as as a commitment to make sure that we don’t fall behind. So you‘re really asking about your second question. You’re asking about July. And I guess if you, if you ask, you know, if we gotten the July report before the meeting, would we have cut we might well of we didn‘t make that decision, but you know that we might well have, I think that’s not, you know, that doesn‘t really answer the question that we ask ourselves, which is, let’s look, you know, when at this meeting, we‘re looking back to the July employment report, the August employment report, the two CPI reports, one of which came, of course, during blackout, and all the other things that I mentioned, we’re looking at all of those things and we‘re asking ourselves, what’s the right what‘s our what’s the policy stance we need to move to? We knew it‘s clear that we clearly, literally everyone on the committee agreed that it’s time to move. It‘s just how big, how fast you go, and what do you think about the pass forward? So this decision we made today had broad support on the committee, and I’ve discussed the path ahead. Elizabeth,
你对滞后的观念是对的,但我只想指出全体经济。美国经济正在稳步添加。假如你看看猜想者或与公司攀谈,他们会说他们以为2025年也应该是好年初。所以美国经济底子上没问题。我以为咱们的举动是及时的。你能够把咱们的50个基点调整看作是一种许诺,以保证咱们不会落后。假如在7月份FOMC会议前拿到当月非农数据,咱们其时是否会降息呢,或许会,可是我以为这并没有真实答复咱们问自己的问题,那便是,让咱们看看,在这次会议上,咱们回忆了7月份的作业陈述、8 月份的作业陈述、两份CPI陈述,其间一份是在静默期内发布的,以及我说到的一切其他作业,咱们正在研讨一切这些作业,咱们在问自己,什么是正确的,咱们需求采纳什么样的方针情绪?咱们知道,很明显,委员会中的每个人都赞同是时分采纳举动了。仅仅规划有多大,速度有多快,你对未来利率途径有什么观念?所以咱们今日做出的这个决议得到了委员会的广泛支撑,我现已谈论了未来的路途。
问题16:mortgage rates have already been dropping in anticipation of this announcement. How much more should borrowers expect those rates to drop over the next year?
按揭典当借款利率现已在预期降息时就下降了。估量下一年这些利率还会下降多少?
答复16:
Very hard for me to say that‘s from our standpoint. I can, I can’t really speak the mortgage rates. I will say, you know, that will depend on on how the economy evolves. Our our intention, though, is we think that our policy was appropriately restrictive. We think that it‘s time to begin the process of recalibrating it to a level that’s more neutral, rather than restricted. We expect that process to take some time, as you can see in the projections that we released today, and as if things work out according to that forecast, other rates in the economy will come down as well. However, the rate at which those things happen will really depend on how the economy performs. We can‘t see, we can’t look a year ahead and know what the economy is to be doing.
从咱们的视点来看,我很难说。我不能真实议论典当借款利率。我会说,这取决于经济怎么开展。但咱们的目的是,咱们以为咱们的方针是恰当的有限制性。咱们以为是时分初步将其从头调整到更中性而不是坚持限制性的水平了。咱们估量这个进程需求一些时刻,正如你在咱们今日发布的猜想中所看到的,假如作业依照猜想开展,经济中的其他利率也会下降。但是,这些作业产生的速度实践上取决于经济的体现。咱们无法看到,咱们无法展望一年后的经济情况。
What‘s your message to households who are frustrated that home prices have still stayed so high as rates have been high? What do you say to those households?
诘问:关于那些由于利率居高不下而房价居高不下的家庭,您有什么话要说?
Well, I can what I can say to the public is that we had the highest we had a burst of inflation.Many other countries around the world had had a similar burst of inflation. And when that happens, part of the answer is that we raise interest rates in order to cool the economy off in order to reduce inflationary pressures. It‘s not something that people experience as pleasant, but at the end, what you get is low inflation restored. Price stability, restored. And a good definition of price stability is that people in their daily decisions, they’re not thinking about inflation anymore. That‘s where everyone wants to be, is back to what’s inflation, you know, just keep it low, keep it stable. We‘re restoring that. So what we’re going through now, really, it restores it will benefit people over a long period of time. Price stability benefits everybody over a long period of time, just by virtue of the fact that they don‘t have to deal with inflation. So that’s what‘s been going on. And I think we’ve made real progress. I completely we don‘t tell people how to think about the economy, of course, and of course, people are experiencing high prices, as opposed to high inflation, and we understand that’s painful.
我能够告知大众的是,咱们阅历了最高的通货膨胀,世界上许多其他国家也阅历过相似的通货膨胀。当这种情况产生时,部分处理办法是咱们前进利率,以便冷却经济,然后削减通胀压力。这不是人们会感到愉快的作业,但终究,咱们得到的是康复低通胀。康复价格安稳。价格安稳的一个好界说是,人们在日常决议方案中不再考虑通货膨胀。这便是每个人都期望的,即坚持通胀在低位和安稳。咱们正在康复这种情况。所以咱们现在正在阅历的,真的,康复这种情况将在很长一段时刻内使人们获益。价格安稳在很长一段时刻内使每个人都获益,由于他们不用应对通货膨胀。这便是正在产生的作业。我以为咱们现已取得了真实的前进。我彻底不会告知人们应该怎么看待经济,当然,人们正在阅历高物价,而不是高通胀,咱们了解这是苦楚的。
问题17:I was wondering if you could go through you said just at the beginning that coming into the blackout, there was like an open thought of 25 or 50. You know, the fact that we‘re either 25 or 50, I would sort of argue that when we had those two last speeches by Governor Waller and New York President John Williams, that they were, they were sort of saying that maybe a gradual approach was going to win the day. I mean, I sort of want to ask a seven part question about this. But I mean, could you talk, would you have cut rates by 50 basis points if the market had been pricing in, like, low odds of a 50 point move, like they were last Wednesday. You know, after the CPI number came out, there’s a really small probability of a 50 point cut. Does it play playing your consideration at all.
美联储官员刚进入揭露说话的静默期时,人们关于降息25个基点仍是50个基点持敞开情绪。理事沃勒和纽约联储主席威廉姆斯的说话也说渐进式降息会占优势。假如商场定价的是不太或许降息50个基点,您这次还会大幅降息吗?商场的定价押注是否影响到美联储的决议方案?
答复17:
Thank you. We‘re always going to try to do what we think is the right thing for the economy at that time. That’s what we‘ll do, and that’s what we did today.
咱们总是会极力做咱们以为对其时的经济有利的作业。这便是咱们要做的,也是咱们今日所做的。
问题18:you‘ve mentioned how closely you’re watching the labor market, but you also noted that payroll numbers have been a little bit less reliable lately because of the big downward revisions. Does that put your focus overwhelmingly on the unemployment rate? And given the SEP projection of 4.4 basically being the peak in the cycle, would going above that be the kind of thing that would trigger another 50 basis point cut.
您说到过您亲近重视劳动力商场,但您也指出,由于遭受大幅下修,最近作业人数的可靠性有所下降。这是否意味着您的注意力首要会集在赋闲率上?鉴于SEP猜想的4.4%底子上是周期中的赋闲率峰值,超越这一水平是否会引发另一次50个基点的大幅降息?
答复18:
So we will continue to look at that broad array of labor market data, including the payroll numbers. We‘re not discarding those. I mean, we’ll certainly look at those, but we will mentally tend to adjust them based on the Q, C, E, W adjustment, which you referred to. There isn‘t a bright line, you know, it will be the light that the unemployment rate’s very important, of course, but there isn‘t a single statistic or a single bright line over which that thing that might move, that would dictate one thing or another. We’ll look at each meeting, we‘ll look at all the data on inflation, economic activity and the labor market, and we’ll make decisions about is our policy stance where it needs to be to, you know, to foster over the medium term, our mandate goals. Yeah, so I can‘t, I can’t say we, we have a bright line in mind.
咱们将持续重视广泛的劳动力商场数据,包含非农作业。咱们不会抛弃这些数据。我的意思是,咱们必定会重视这些数据,但咱们在心理上会倾向于依据您说到的 QCEW 调整来调整它们。没有一条清晰的界限,当然,赋闲率十分重要,但没有一个统计数据或一条清晰的界限能够决议这件事或那件事。咱们会在每次会议上,检查有关通货膨胀、经济活动和劳动力商场的一切数据,并决议咱们的方针情绪,以便在中期内促进咱们的授权任务。所以我不能说咱们心中有一条清晰的界限。
问题19:I know that you discussed earlier how the Fed does whatever the right thing is and nothing else factors in. But in general, can you talk about whether or not you believe a sitting US president should have a say in fed decisions on interest rates? Because that‘s something that former President Trump, who obviously points of view, has previously, suggested, and I know the Fed is designed to be independent, but why can you tell the public why you view that so important?
我知道您之前谈论过美联储会做正确的作业,其他要素都不考虑。但总的来说,您能否谈谈您是否以为现任美国总统应该对美联储的利率决议方案有说话权?由于这是前总统特朗普之前提出的,他明显有自己的观念,我知道美联储的规划初衷是独立的,但您为什么能告知大众您以为这一点如此重要呢?
答复19:
Sure, so countries that are democracies around the world, countries that are sort of like the United States, all have what are called independent central banks. And the reason is that that people have found, over time, that insulating the central bank from direct control by political authorities avoids making monetary policy in a way that that favors, maybe people who are in office as opposed to people who are not in office. So that that‘s, that’s the idea, is that, you know, I think the data are clear that countries that have independent central banks, they get lower inflation. And so we‘re, you know, we’re not, we do our work to serve all Americans. We‘re not serving any politician, any political figure, any cause, any issue, nothing. It’s just maximum employment and price stability on behalf of all Americans, and that‘s how the other central banks are set up to it. It’s a good institutional arrangement which has been good for the public, and I hope and strongly, strongly believe that it will. You know, continue.
当然,像美国这样的民主国家都有所谓的独立央行。原因是,跟着时刻推移,人们发现,将央行与政治当局的直接操控阻隔开来,能够防止拟定仅仅有利于在位者的钱银方针。这便是咱们的主意,我以为数据清楚地标明,具有独立央行的国家通胀率较低。所以咱们的作业是为了服务一切美国人。咱们不为任何政客、任何政治人物、任何工作、任何议题服务,什么都不为。咱们仅仅为一切美国人完成最大化作业和价格安稳,其他央行便是这样树立的。这是一个对大众有利的杰出准则组织,我期望并深信它会持续下去。
问题20:a couple regulatory developments in the past week that I want to ask you about. First last week, Vice Chair for supervision, Michael Barr outlined his views for the changes to the Basel three end game. I‘m wondering if you are in line with him on those changes should be if those have support the board in a broad way that you’re looking for, and if you think the other agencies are also fully on board with that approach
我想问您关于曩昔一周的几个监管开展。首要,上星期美联储担任监管的副主席Michael Barr概述了他对巴塞尔协议三监管规矩改动的观念。我想知道您是否赞同他的观念,是否其他组织也彻底支撑这种办法?
答复20:
So the answer to your question is that, yes, those those changes were negotiated between the agencies with my support and with my involvement, with the idea that we were going to re propose, we propose the changes that we, that Vice Chair Barr talked about, and then take comment on them. So yes, that that is, you know, that‘s happening with my support. That’s not a final proposal, though. You understand, we‘re putting them out for comment. We’re going to take comment and make appropriate changes that we don‘t have a, we don’t have a calendar date for that. And as for the other agencies, you know, the idea is that we‘re all moving together. We’re not moving separately. So that I don‘t, I don’t know exactly where that is, but the idea is that we will move as a group to put this again out for comment, and then, you know, it‘ll, it’ll come the comments will come back 60 days later, and we‘ll dive into them, and we’ll try to bring this to a conclusion sometime in the first half of next year.
对你问题的答复是“是的”,这些改动是在我支撑和参加下由各组织洽谈达到的,咱们的主意是从头提出,咱们提出巴尔副主席谈到的改动,然后征求定见。所以是的,那是在我的支撑下产生的。但这不是终究提案。你知道,咱们正在征求定见。咱们将征求定见并做出恰当的改动,但咱们没有详细的日期。至于其他组织,你知道,咱们的主意是咱们都一同举动。咱们不会分隔举动。所以我不知道详细在哪里,但咱们的主意是,咱们将作为一个团队再次将这个问题提出来征求定见,然后,你知道,60 天后咱们会收到谈论,咱们会深入研讨它们,并测验在下一年上半年的某个时分得出定论。
Then yesterday, there were merger reform finalizations from the other bank regulators. What does that have to do to align itself on merger?
诘问:昨日,其他银行监管组织也敲定了兼并改革方案。这对兼并有什么影响?
You know, I would, I would bounce that question to Vice Chair Barr. It‘s a good question, but I don’t have that today. Thanks Jennifer for the last question.
你知道,我会把这个问题转交给巴尔副主席。这是个好问题,但我今日没有答案。
问题21:you said earlier that the decision today reflects with appropriate recalibration, strength in the labor market that can be maintained in the context of moderate growth, even though the policy statement says you view the risks to inflation and job growth as roughly balanced, given what you‘ve said. Though today, I’m curious, are you more worried about the job market and growth than inflation? Are they not roughly balanced?
您之前说过,今日的决议反映了通过恰当调整后,劳动力商场在温文添加的布景下仍能坚持微弱,虽然方针声明中说,您以为通胀和作业添加的危险大致平衡,不过我很猎奇,您是否更忧虑作业商场和添加而不是通胀?它们不是大致平衡的吗?
答复21:
No, I think, I think, and we think they are now roughly balanced. So if you go back for a long time, the risks were on inflation. We had historically tight labor market, historically tight. There was a severe labor shortage, so very, very hot labor market, and we had inflation way above target. So you know that said to us, concentrate on inflation. Concentrate on inflation. And we did for a while, and we and we kept at that, that the stance that we put in place 14 months ago was a stance that was focused on bringing down inflation. Part of bringing down inflation, though, is is cooling off the economy, and a little bit cooling off the labor market. You now have a cooler labor market, in part because of of our activity. So what that tells you is it‘s time to change our stance. So we did that. The sense of the change in the stance is that we’re recalibrating our policy over time to a stance that will be more neutral. And today was we, I think we made a good, strong start on that. I think it was the right decision, and I think it should send a signal that we, you know, that we‘re committed to coming up with a good outcome here,
不,我以为,而且咱们以为现在它们大致平衡了。所以假如你回忆很长一段时刻,危险在于通货膨胀过高。咱们的劳动力商场处于历史性严峻时期。劳动力严峻缺少,因而劳动力商场十分十分火爆,而且通货膨胀率远高于方针。所以你知道,这告知咱们,要会集精力应对通货膨胀。咱们的确这样做了一段时刻,而且咱们一向坚持这样做,14个月前咱们拟定的情绪是专心于下降通货膨胀。但是,下降通货膨胀的一部分是冷却经济,以及略微冷却劳动力商场。现在劳动力商场冷却了,部分原因是咱们的活动。所以这告知你是时分改动咱们的情绪了。所以咱们这样做了。情绪改动的含义在于,咱们正在跟着时刻的推移从头调整咱们的方针,使其情绪愈加中立。而今日,我以为咱们在这方面取得了杰出的初步。我以为这是正确的决议,我以为这应该宣告一个信号,标明咱们致力于达到一个好的成果。
to a shock now that could tip it into recession?
诘问:大幅降息是否会令商场震动并觉得经济衰退挨近呢?
I don‘t think so. I don’t there‘s as I look, well, let me look at it this way. I don’t see anything in the economy right now that suggests that the likelihood of a recession, sorry, of a downturn is elevated. I Okay I don‘t see that, you see you see growth at a solid rate. You see inflation coming down and you see a labor market that’s still at very solid levels. It‘s so, so I don’t really see that now.
我不这么以为。现在,我没有看到任何痕迹标明经济衰退的或许性添加。你看到经济添加率安稳。你看到通货膨胀率下降,你看到劳动力商场依然处于十分安稳的水平。现实便是如此,所以我现在真的看不到这一点。
危险提示及免责条款
商场有危险,出资需慎重。本文不构成个人出资主张,也未考虑到单个用户特别的出资方针、财务情况或需求。用户应考虑本文中的任何定见、观念或定论是否契合其特定情况。据此出资,职责自傲。
来历:商场资讯 华尔街见识 鲍威尔屡次着重,美联储将逐次会议做出决议方案,不会遭到商场对降息预期定价的影响,也不会考虑任何政治要素和议题,而是用“对其时(数据)适宜的速度或快或慢地采纳(降息)举动...